A Return to Origins (Again)
The early Christian martyrs were not reading the apocryphal Gospel of Thomas or the hypothetical sayings source that scholars refer to as “Q.” They were reading Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
By N.T. Wright
Picture
There is now a new myth of Christian origins. It feeds, as do many myths, off the weaknesses of its supposed alternatives.
There were (and probably still are) two classic accounts of Christian origins:
In the Catholic version, Jesus taught true religion; the apostles (especially Peter) went on teaching it; and the task of the church thereafter was to stick close to Peter, hence to Jesus, hence to God. Occasional heresies shoot off into darkness, leaving the straight and narrow line of light and life.
In the Protestant version, Jesus, the apostles and the early church fathers taught true theology; the medieval church muddled it up with priestcraft, masses for the dead and other pagan mumbo jumbo; Luther and others rediscovered the biblical (and Patristic) truth. Not a straight line, perhaps, but quite a simple story: 500 good years, 1,000 bad years and then the Great Light.

Join the BAS Library!


Already a library member? Login at the members box (top right).