The Forgery Trial of the Century Special Collection
With a verdict soon expected in the six-year-long Jerusalem trial to determine whether or not the James ossuary, the Yehoash tablet and other ancient artifacts were illegally forged, the articles below highlight the various scholarly and scientific arguments that have been made both for and against the authenticity of these remarkable finds. In addition, we list articles that conveniently summarize the major players and key developments in a trial that included 116 sessions, saw more than 130 witnesses called to the stand and produced nearly 12,000 pages of testimony. The articles were hand-selected by the Biblical Archaeology Review editors especially for members of the BAS Library.
The articles below were hand-selected by the Biblical Archaeology Review editors especially for members of the BAS Library.
The James Ossuary
Burial Box of James the Brother of Jesus
BAR 28:06, Nov/Dec 2002By André Lemaire
Brother of Jesus Ossuary
BAR 29:04, Jul/Aug 2003By Edward J. Keall
Summary report of the Examining Committees for the James Ossuary and Yehoash Inscription
BAR 29:05, Sep/Oct 2003Final Blow to IAA Report
BAR 30:01, Jan/Feb 2004By James A. Harrell
The Yehoash Tablet
Is It or Isn’t It?
BAR 29:02, Mar/Apr 2003By Hershel Shanks
Don’t Rush to Judgment
BAR 30:02, Mar/Apr 2004By David Noel Freedman
Strata: New Study Supports Authenticity of Yehoash Inscription
BAR 35:03, May/Jun 2009Ivory Pomegranate and Other Antiquities
Probable Head of Priestly Scepter from Solomon’s Temple Surfaces in Jerusalem
BAR 10:01, Jan/Feb 1984By André Lemaire




